A Newspaper Hand
We are playing the B/C/D pairs at the 2005 Pittsburgh Nationals. The Directors ask us if we would mind playing North/South in both sessions. Would we mind playing for free? Would we mind seeing the hand records in advance?
In the evening session, I pick up
AK876 / 32 / AK95 / A8
as dealer, both vulnerable, and I open 1. My partner bids 4, a splinter, showing game-forcing strength and a singleton diamond. We should have enough high cards for slam; the only question is the hearts. I bid 5 to allow partner to show the A if he has it, which he does by bidding 5. Come to think of it, 4NT would have been better, because partner might have bid 5 over 5 to show a diamond void, and then I wouldn’t have learned what I really needed to know. But no harm done. I go to 6 and all pass. After the lead of the 4 I see:
J 10 5 2 A K J 10 8 Q J 10 5 |
||
A K 8 7 6 3 2 A K 9 5 A 8 |
W |
N |
E |
S |
1 |
|||
P |
4 |
P |
5 |
P |
5 |
P |
6 |
P |
P |
P |
I win with the A and cash the AK of trumps. The opposing trumps are 2-2, so the Queen comes down. The contract is secure (my only loser is a club) and I can finesse in hearts or clubs for an overtrick. But I can only try one finesse—if it loses, the other won’t get me back the trick! So which one?
The correct answer is—neither. I can combine the chances by cashing the K and then ruffing a heart in hand to see if the Q drops. If it doesn’t I still have the club finesse in reserve.
Lo and behold, on the third heart, East drops the Queen. I ruff a diamond over to dummy and discard my losing club on the 10. Making seven for +1460.
And for a change we get a good score—11.5 matchpoints out of 12! There were a lot of +1430s, but only two +1460s. Some people just can’t resist a finesse, and both finesses were wrong—a real newspaper hand.
We finish at 60.1%, our best session of the tournament.
The full hand was:
J 10 5 2 A K J 10 8 Q J 10 5 |
||
Q 3 8 7 6 4 4 3 2 K 7 4 2 |
9 4 Q 9 5 Q J 10 7 6 9 6 3 |
|
A K 8 7 6 3 2 A K 9 5 A 8 |
[Pittsburg NABC, B/C/D Pairs, 3-19-2005]