A Newspaper Hand
We are playing the B/C/D pairs at the 2005 Pittsburgh Nationals. The Directors ask us if we would mind playing North/South in both sessions. Would we mind playing for free? Would we mind seeing the hand records in advance?
In the evening session, I pick up
AK876 /
32 /
AK95
/
A8
as dealer, both vulnerable, and I open 1
.
My partner bids 4
, a splinter,
showing game-forcing strength and a singleton diamond. We should have enough
high cards for slam; the only question is the hearts. I bid 5
to allow partner to show the
A
if he has it, which he does by bidding 5
.
Come to think of it, 4NT would have been better, because partner might have
bid 5
over 5
to show a diamond void, and then I wouldn’t have learned what I really
needed to know. But no harm done. I go to 6
and all pass. After the lead of the
4
I see:
J 10 5 2 A K J 10 8 Q J 10 5 |
||
![]() |
||
A K 8 7 6 3 2 A K 9 5 A 8 |
W |
N |
E |
S |
1 |
|||
P |
4 |
P |
5 |
P |
5 |
P |
6 |
P |
P |
P |
I win with the
A and cash the
AK of trumps. The opposing trumps are 2-2, so the Queen comes down. The contract
is secure (my only loser is a club) and I can finesse in hearts or clubs for
an overtrick. But I can only try one finesse—if it loses, the other won’t
get me back the trick! So which one?
The correct answer is—neither. I can combine the chances
by cashing the
K and then ruffing a heart in hand
to see if the
Q drops. If it doesn’t I still
have the club finesse in reserve.
Lo and behold, on the third heart, East drops the Queen. I
ruff a diamond over to dummy and discard my losing club on the
10.
Making seven for +1460.
And for a change we get a good score—11.5 matchpoints out of 12! There were a lot of +1430s, but only two +1460s. Some people just can’t resist a finesse, and both finesses were wrong—a real newspaper hand.
We finish at 60.1%, our best session of the tournament.
The full hand was:
J 10 5 2 A K J 10 8 Q J 10 5 |
||
Q 3 8 7 6 4 4 3 2
K 7 4 2 |
![]() |
9 4 Q 9 5 Q J 10 7 6 9 6 3 |
| |
[Pittsburg NABC, B/C/D Pairs, 3-19-2005]